This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author steven.daprano
Recipients Carlos Neves, lemburg, mark.dickinson, rhettinger, steven.daprano, stutzbach, tim.peters
Date 2020-07-02.21:45:53
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1593726353.65.0.676483686312.issue41198@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
Thank you for your long and detailed bug report, but please post one issue per bug report.

Tim, we agree that the notion of significant figures is irrelevant; is Carlos' even/odd test sufficiently flawed that we should close this bug report, or keep it open to investigate the rounding bias issue? My feeling is that it is sufficiently flawed that we can just close this, but it's too early in the morning for me to articulate why :-)
History
Date User Action Args
2020-07-02 21:45:53steven.dapranosetrecipients: + steven.daprano, lemburg, tim.peters, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, stutzbach, Carlos Neves
2020-07-02 21:45:53steven.dapranosetmessageid: <1593726353.65.0.676483686312.issue41198@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2020-07-02 21:45:53steven.dapranolinkissue41198 messages
2020-07-02 21:45:53steven.dapranocreate