Author eric.smith
Recipients Seth.Troisi, eric.smith, ezio.melotti, mrabarnett, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka
Date 2020-06-16.12:30:13
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1592310613.58.0.408270103003.issue39949@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
There was a discussion in issue40984 that the repr must be eval-able. I don't feel very strongly about this, mainly because I don't think anyone ever does eval(repr(some_regex)). I'd be slightly sympathetic to wanting the eval to fail if the repr had to truncate its output, instead of succeeding because the string was still a valid, but different, regex.
History
Date User Action Args
2020-06-16 12:30:13eric.smithsetrecipients: + eric.smith, rhettinger, ezio.melotti, mrabarnett, Seth.Troisi, serhiy.storchaka
2020-06-16 12:30:13eric.smithsetmessageid: <1592310613.58.0.408270103003.issue39949@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2020-06-16 12:30:13eric.smithlinkissue39949 messages
2020-06-16 12:30:13eric.smithcreate