Author aeros
Recipients abacabadabacaba, achimnol, aeros, asvetlov, fantix, lukasz.langa, miss-islington, ned.deily, vstinner, yselivanov
Date 2020-06-14.06:45:04
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1592117104.52.0.725272536213.issue30064@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
> Last question before PR pls: given the fact that this test is to cover a fixed case when loop.sock_*() was hanging forever, should I keep the wait_for(..., timeout=10)?

For now, I think we can keep the asyncio.wait_for() w/ 10 the sec timeout. I'll have to run the tests locally though w/ the patch to double check (once the PR is opened), and it may still end up needing to be increased if the test fails again in the future. It should be okay though.
History
Date User Action Args
2020-06-14 06:45:04aerossetrecipients: + aeros, vstinner, fantix, ned.deily, asvetlov, abacabadabacaba, lukasz.langa, yselivanov, achimnol, miss-islington
2020-06-14 06:45:04aerossetmessageid: <1592117104.52.0.725272536213.issue30064@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2020-06-14 06:45:04aeroslinkissue30064 messages
2020-06-14 06:45:04aeroscreate