This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author jaraco
Recipients eryksun, jaraco, paul.moore, steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware
Date 2020-05-22.16:58:01
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1590166681.16.0.974869602936.issue40654@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
> Unless you're specifically testing single steps through symlink chains, you probably want to just use realpath anyway.

I do see now the references to `realpath` in the docs... and I think that satisfies the need I described above. It doesn't supply the `f`, but it provides a mechanism to resolve the ultimate file. As you say, there's still no regular solution for resolving intermediate links in a chain of symlinks with user-friendly names, but it seems like a much less severe limitation (platform variation).

I'll see if `realpath` satisfies the test suite needs for path pie.
History
Date User Action Args
2020-05-22 16:58:01jaracosetrecipients: + jaraco, paul.moore, tim.golden, zach.ware, eryksun, steve.dower
2020-05-22 16:58:01jaracosetmessageid: <1590166681.16.0.974869602936.issue40654@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2020-05-22 16:58:01jaracolinkissue40654 messages
2020-05-22 16:58:01jaracocreate