Message 369607 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	eric.smith
Recipients	docs@python, eric.smith
Date	2020-05-22.14:39:35
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1590158375.86.0.395536416991.issue40730@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to

Content
https://docs.python.org/3.9/whatsnew/3.9.html#optimizations has this sentence: "Unlike to the := operator this idiom does not leak a variable to the outer scope.". I'm not exactly sure what it should be. Probably the first "to" should be deleted?

https://docs.python.org/3.9/whatsnew/3.9.html#optimizations has this sentence: "Unlike to the := operator this idiom does not leak a variable to the outer scope.". I'm not exactly sure what it should be. Probably the first "to" should be deleted?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2020-05-22 14:39:35	eric.smith	set	recipients: + eric.smith, docs@python
2020-05-22 14:39:35	eric.smith	set	messageid: <1590158375.86.0.395536416991.issue40730@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2020-05-22 14:39:35	eric.smith	link	issue40730 messages
2020-05-22 14:39:35	eric.smith	create