Message 367423 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	aviso
Recipients	Amir, Darragh Bailey, anthonypjshaw, aviso, cjw296, lisroach, mariocj89, michael.foord, pconnell, r.david.murray, rbcollins, serhiy.storchaka, xtreak
Date	2020-04-27.14:01:14
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1587996074.53.0.984058713266.issue39966@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to

Content
Checking for presence and then falling through to the <=3.8 behavior as in the patch, seems reasonable. The default magic method behavior presumably comes out of research, trial, and error. If the docs need to be clearer, I think that's different that scrapping the whole approach.

Checking for presence and then falling through to the <=3.8 behavior as in the patch, seems reasonable. The default magic method behavior presumably comes out of research, trial, and error. If the docs need to be clearer, I think that's different that scrapping the whole approach.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2020-04-27 14:01:14	aviso	set	recipients: + aviso, rbcollins, cjw296, r.david.murray, michael.foord, serhiy.storchaka, pconnell, Darragh Bailey, lisroach, anthonypjshaw, mariocj89, xtreak, Amir
2020-04-27 14:01:14	aviso	set	messageid: <1587996074.53.0.984058713266.issue39966@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2020-04-27 14:01:14	aviso	link	issue39966 messages
2020-04-27 14:01:14	aviso	create