This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author vstinner
Recipients BTaskaya, gvanrossum, lys.nikolaou, pablogsal, vstinner
Date 2020-04-22.15:16:53
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1587568613.86.0.974744348815.issue40334@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
Once PR 19503 will be merged, I would be interested to see if setjmp()/longjmp() can be avoided. I'm scared by these functions: they require that all functions in between setjmp() and longjmp() call stack have no state and don't need any cleanup at exit.
History
Date User Action Args
2020-04-22 15:16:53vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, gvanrossum, lys.nikolaou, pablogsal, BTaskaya
2020-04-22 15:16:53vstinnersetmessageid: <1587568613.86.0.974744348815.issue40334@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2020-04-22 15:16:53vstinnerlinkissue40334 messages
2020-04-22 15:16:53vstinnercreate