➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author eelizondo
Recipients carljm, corona10, dino.viehland, eelizondo, gregory.p.smith, nascheme, pablogsal, pitrou, shihai1991, steve.dower, tim.peters, vstinner
Date 2020-04-16.04:42:52
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1587012173.18.0.840304478339.issue40255@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content 
After the added optimizations and assuming that running this more rigorously (i.e PGO + LTO + full cpu isolation + speed.python.org machine) also shows the PR as perf neutral, what are people's thoughts so far?

Would this be enough to consider adding this change by default?

Are there still any concerns regarding correctness? It seems like most of the questions raised so far have already been addressed
History
Date User Action Args
2020-04-16 04:42:53eelizondosetrecipients: + eelizondo, tim.peters, nascheme, gregory.p.smith, pitrou, vstinner, carljm, dino.viehland, steve.dower, corona10, pablogsal, shihai1991
2020-04-16 04:42:53eelizondosetmessageid: <1587012173.18.0.840304478339.issue40255@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2020-04-16 04:42:53eelizondolinkissue40255 messages
2020-04-16 04:42:52eelizondocreate