Message366387
>> This isn't actually about removing immortal objects, but removing *mutable*
>> objects that would be shared between subinterpreters. Making some objects
>> immortal, such as interned strings or stateless singletons, would actually
>> benefit this work, as they could then be safely shared between
>> subinterpreters.
>
> From what I understood, we simply cannot share any object (mutable or not)
> between two subinterpreters. Otherwise, we will need to put a lock on all
> Py_INCREF/Py_DECREF operation which would kill performances of running
> multiple interpreters in parallel. Join bpo-39511 discussion.
That thread consists of everyone else telling you what I've just told you. Not sure that me telling you as well is going to help ;) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2020-04-14 13:55:01 | steve.dower | set | recipients:
+ steve.dower, tim.peters, nascheme, gregory.p.smith, pitrou, vstinner, corona10, pablogsal, eelizondo, shihai1991 |
2020-04-14 13:55:00 | steve.dower | set | messageid: <1586872500.97.0.19608931623.issue40255@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2020-04-14 13:55:00 | steve.dower | link | issue40255 messages |
2020-04-14 13:55:00 | steve.dower | create | |
|