Message 365918 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	pablogsal
Recipients	corona10, pablogsal, shihai1991, vstinner
Date	2020-04-07.16:54:33
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1586278473.59.0.118485211714.issue40217@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to

Content
> I propose to modify the GC to take bpo-35810 in account. What? The GC is agnostic of what it receives. It works with objects in general that implement the gc support, but it does not care about what those objects are. The only specal case are weakreferences and because those have inherit GC semantics. I am not sure about what you are proposing, could you elaborate?

> I propose to modify the GC to take bpo-35810 in account.

What? The GC is agnostic of what it receives. It works with objects in general that implement the gc support, but it does not care about what those objects are. The only specal case are weakreferences and because those have inherit GC semantics.

I am not sure about what you are proposing, could you elaborate?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2020-04-07 16:54:33	pablogsal	set	recipients: + pablogsal, vstinner, corona10, shihai1991
2020-04-07 16:54:33	pablogsal	set	messageid: <1586278473.59.0.118485211714.issue40217@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2020-04-07 16:54:33	pablogsal	link	issue40217 messages
2020-04-07 16:54:33	pablogsal	create