Author rhettinger
Recipients Zahari.Dim, belopolsky, christian.heimes, eric.smith, gaborjbernat, gdr@garethrees.org, lukasz.langa, martin.panter, orsenthil, pablogsal, remi.lapeyre, rhettinger, terry.reedy, tim.peters, tshepang, wim.glenn
Date 2020-04-02.18:48:58
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1585853339.53.0.0269448119345.issue17005@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
At some point in the next two or three weeks, I'll have a chance to work on this more and to offer a competing patch.  IMO, the current checkin is over-engineered, both in its API and implementation.  This could have been a simple, fast tool written as one or two short Python functions.

Also, I would like to try to out the API alternatives on some groups of engineers to get some user feedback.

For me, as the API currently stands, I would have to write a wrapper to make it usable for my applications.
History
Date User Action Args
2020-04-02 18:48:59rhettingersetrecipients: + rhettinger, tim.peters, terry.reedy, belopolsky, orsenthil, eric.smith, christian.heimes, lukasz.langa, tshepang, gdr@garethrees.org, martin.panter, wim.glenn, Zahari.Dim, pablogsal, remi.lapeyre, gaborjbernat
2020-04-02 18:48:59rhettingersetmessageid: <1585853339.53.0.0269448119345.issue17005@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2020-04-02 18:48:59rhettingerlinkissue17005 messages
2020-04-02 18:48:58rhettingercreate