Message364429
Consider the case where a thread that doesn't hold the GIL attempts to get a reference on `None`.
The problem with having a single immortal `None`, is that it will cause data cache thrashing as two different CPUs modify the refcount on the shared `None` object.
Each subinterpreter needs its own distinct `None`.
`None` could be made immortal, it just can't be shared between sub-interpreters. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2020-03-17 14:10:55 | Mark.Shannon | set | recipients:
+ Mark.Shannon, rhettinger, ncoghlan, vstinner, larry, jkloth, phsilva, jeremy.kloth, eric.snow, maciej.szulik, nanjekyejoannah, shihai1991 |
2020-03-17 14:10:55 | Mark.Shannon | set | messageid: <1584454255.51.0.514415647375.issue39511@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2020-03-17 14:10:55 | Mark.Shannon | link | issue39511 messages |
2020-03-17 14:10:55 | Mark.Shannon | create | |
|