Message364074
Let's consider ssl error `291` (https://bugs.python.org/issue39951):
It was introduced into openssl 2 years ago: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/358ffa05cd3a088822c7d06256bc87516d918798
The documentation states:
SSL_R_APPLICATION_DATA_AFTER_CLOSE_NOTIFY:291:\
application data after close notify
The `ssl.h` header file contains:
# define SSL_R_APPLICATION_DATA_AFTER_CLOSE_NOTIFY 291
The master branch of openssl contains this definition too:
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/blob/master/include/openssl/sslerr.h
# define SSL_R_APPLICATION_DATA_AFTER_CLOSE_NOTIFY 291
But what does Python say?
ssl.SSLError: [SSL: KRB5_S_INIT] application data after close notify (_ssl.c:2629)
What's KRB5? It supposedly stands for Kerberos5, and it too is seemingly present in openssl header file:
/usr/local/Cellar/openssl/1.0.2s/include/openssl/ssl.h
2951:# define SSL_R_KRB5_S_INIT 291
Moreover, cpython source code contains a fallback, should this value not be defined:
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/master/Modules/_ssl_data.h
#ifdef SSL_R_KRB5_S_INIT
{"KRB5_S_INIT", ERR_LIB_SSL, SSL_R_KRB5_S_INIT},
#else
{"KRB5_S_INIT", ERR_LIB_SSL, 291},
#endif
Thus, today, Python reports an error with wrong *label* but correct *text*:
[SSL: KRB5_S_INIT] application data after close notify
The label and text don't match each other, because... well... I guess that's why we should fix it :) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2020-03-13 04:07:50 | Dima.Tisnek | set | recipients:
+ Dima.Tisnek |
2020-03-13 04:07:50 | Dima.Tisnek | set | messageid: <1584072470.83.0.437860249809.issue39953@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2020-03-13 04:07:50 | Dima.Tisnek | link | issue39953 messages |
2020-03-13 04:07:50 | Dima.Tisnek | create | |
|