Message 361357 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	eric.snow
Recipients	eric.snow, jeremy.kloth, jkloth, nanjekyejoannah, ncoghlan, rhettinger, vstinner
Date	2020-02-04.16:27:22
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<CALFfu7CjuV64rbjkX=bRoJga_kgjoJGFA9GWhageWAgdRjZJLg@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to	<CALFfu7AJ9sdX1YcEVL6BO7NGgS9u87cfy-rEK+s0PsLR4AR1Jg@mail.gmail.com>

Content
> This is pretty much one of the two approaches I have been considering. The other approach is to leave the current static singletons alone and only use them for the main interpreter. Each subinterpreter would get its own copy, created when that interpreter is initialized.

> This is pretty much one of the two approaches I have been considering.

The other approach is to leave the current static singletons alone and
only use them for the main interpreter.  Each subinterpreter would get
its own copy, created when that interpreter is initialized.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2020-02-04 16:27:22	eric.snow	set	recipients: + eric.snow, rhettinger, ncoghlan, vstinner, jkloth, jeremy.kloth, nanjekyejoannah
2020-02-04 16:27:22	eric.snow	link	issue39511 messages
2020-02-04 16:27:22	eric.snow	create