Author nanjekyejoannah
Recipients Valentyn Tymofieiev, brett.cannon, eric.snow, nanjekyejoannah, ncoghlan, p-ganssle, pablogsal, pitrou, vstinner
Date 2020-01-21.14:14:27
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1579616067.52.0.12529655542.issue35943@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
> Do you mean that there is a risk that the backport introduces a regression in another part of the code? If yes, I would suggest to not backport the change to *stable* branches.

My worry are the many changes that are required to ceval to make this back port work. Not that I think we can not successfully backport things. we can.
History
Date User Action Args
2020-01-21 14:14:27nanjekyejoannahsetrecipients: + nanjekyejoannah, brett.cannon, ncoghlan, pitrou, vstinner, eric.snow, p-ganssle, pablogsal, Valentyn Tymofieiev
2020-01-21 14:14:27nanjekyejoannahsetmessageid: <1579616067.52.0.12529655542.issue35943@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2020-01-21 14:14:27nanjekyejoannahlinkissue35943 messages
2020-01-21 14:14:27nanjekyejoannahcreate