Author vaizki
Recipients aeros, asvetlov, dacut, gvanrossum, ned.deily, njs, pitrou, vaizki, yselivanov
Date 2019-11-22.15:05:46
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1574435146.41.0.0553315225316.issue37228@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
> Are you aware of what currently supported platforms have SO_REUSEPORT defined where the *reuse_port* parameter doesn't actually work? This would be quite helpful to know. 

This was reported by a partner that was working porting our code to Android but might be fixed current Android API levels. I cannot test this myself.

> .. we don't directly support every single available platform, as making the code specific to an OS incurs a long-term maintenance cost

Fully agree, part of the reason why I was suggesting getting rid of reuse_address and reuse_port completely on this higher level API. 

But I'm happy with Antoine's proposal which effectively kills the reuse_address parameter, just suggesting we also kill reuse_port as well.
History
Date User Action Args
2019-11-22 15:05:46vaizkisetrecipients: + vaizki, gvanrossum, pitrou, ned.deily, njs, asvetlov, yselivanov, dacut, aeros
2019-11-22 15:05:46vaizkisetmessageid: <1574435146.41.0.0553315225316.issue37228@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-11-22 15:05:46vaizkilinkissue37228 messages
2019-11-22 15:05:46vaizkicreate