Author vstinner
Recipients Mark.Shannon, brett.cannon, dino.viehland, eric.snow, fabioz, gregory.p.smith, vstinner
Date 2019-11-22.13:39:33
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1574429973.39.0.278030664967.issue38500@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
New question: if we add a public API to Python 3.8.1, would it make sense to directly change eval_frame type to add a new "tstate" parameter? See bpo-38818 for the rationale.

I already proposed a change for the master branch: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/17187

Maybe I should combine PR 17340 (add PyInterpreterState_SetEvalFrameFunc()) with PR 17187 (add tstate parameter).
History
Date User Action Args
2019-11-22 13:39:33vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, brett.cannon, gregory.p.smith, fabioz, dino.viehland, Mark.Shannon, eric.snow
2019-11-22 13:39:33vstinnersetmessageid: <1574429973.39.0.278030664967.issue38500@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-11-22 13:39:33vstinnerlinkissue38500 messages
2019-11-22 13:39:33vstinnercreate