Author taleinat
Recipients cheryl.sabella, rhettinger, taleinat, terry.reedy
Date 2019-11-14.10:33:56
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1573727637.14.0.311107067911.issue37827@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
Note that most of the issues with special characters described in Terry latest comment have been addressed by the fix for issue13153.

Can we continue discussing just properly rendering \r and \b, e.g. as done in PR GH-15211? Let's just decide whether we want this or not.

My main point in favor is that we already have special support for two similar control characters, \n and \t. IMO we should expand this to the other very standardized ones, \r and \b, and perhaps \a ("bell") as well.
History
Date User Action Args
2019-11-14 10:33:57taleinatsetrecipients: + taleinat, rhettinger, terry.reedy, cheryl.sabella
2019-11-14 10:33:57taleinatsetmessageid: <1573727637.14.0.311107067911.issue37827@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-11-14 10:33:57taleinatlinkissue37827 messages
2019-11-14 10:33:56taleinatcreate