Message356492
> We should not claim to support running our tests in weird syscall sandboxes. There's an infinite number of possible sandboxing configurations, and we can't fix them all.
There is no request to support an "an infinite number of possible sandboxing configurations". Only to skip the test if the syscall fails with EPERM. That sounds reasonable to me. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2019-11-12 22:09:28 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, benjamin.peterson, njs, asvetlov, yselivanov, yan12125, nanjekyejoannah, aeros |
2019-11-12 22:09:28 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1573596568.58.0.27316095388.issue38692@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2019-11-12 22:09:28 | vstinner | link | issue38692 messages |
2019-11-12 22:09:28 | vstinner | create | |
|