Author vstinner
Recipients aeros, asvetlov, benjamin.peterson, nanjekyejoannah, njs, vstinner, yan12125, yselivanov
Date 2019-11-12.22:09:28
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1573596568.58.0.27316095388.issue38692@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
> We should not claim to support running our tests in weird syscall sandboxes. There's an infinite number of possible sandboxing configurations, and we can't fix them all.

There is no request to support an "an infinite number of possible sandboxing configurations". Only to skip the test if the syscall fails with EPERM. That sounds reasonable to me.
History
Date User Action Args
2019-11-12 22:09:28vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, benjamin.peterson, njs, asvetlov, yselivanov, yan12125, nanjekyejoannah, aeros
2019-11-12 22:09:28vstinnersetmessageid: <1573596568.58.0.27316095388.issue38692@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-11-12 22:09:28vstinnerlinkissue38692 messages
2019-11-12 22:09:28vstinnercreate