This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author rhettinger
Recipients WarrenWeckesser, gaoxinge, mark.dickinson, rhettinger, steven.daprano, taleinat, tim.peters
Date 2019-11-02.18:29:00
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1572719341.07.0.484302357292.issue38382@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
> Can we go back to the original issue? Should we just 
> document the "early out" behaviour on hitting zero,
> or should we follow the suggestion to check for bad 
> data and raise?

I would follow Tim's recommendation to document it and be done with it.
History
Date User Action Args
2019-11-02 18:29:01rhettingersetrecipients: + rhettinger, tim.peters, mark.dickinson, taleinat, steven.daprano, gaoxinge, WarrenWeckesser
2019-11-02 18:29:01rhettingersetmessageid: <1572719341.07.0.484302357292.issue38382@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-11-02 18:29:01rhettingerlinkissue38382 messages
2019-11-02 18:29:00rhettingercreate