Message355450
> I think we can add `DeprecationWarning` for 3.9.
If we add the deprecation warning just for 3.9, would the removal release also be pushed forward?
> Honestly, we just missed the issue when were prepared for 3.8
Yeah that's definitely understandable, there were quite a number of major changes made in 3.8. It was the first time I saw a deprecation clearly documented in a final release that didn't have an associated deprecation warning.
As for 3.8, I would like to update the whatsnew entry to add a link to this bpo issue if that's okay, as it does not at the moment. I recently included the entry in a PR that added entries for multiple significant changes for asyncio in the 3.8, but I forgot to include the bpo link (mostly because I found it in the documentation, rather than from the bpo issue). |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2019-10-27 07:25:51 | aeros | set | recipients:
+ aeros, asvetlov, serhiy.storchaka, yselivanov, miss-islington, xtreak |
2019-10-27 07:25:51 | aeros | set | messageid: <1572161151.82.0.039178476058.issue34790@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2019-10-27 07:25:51 | aeros | link | issue34790 messages |
2019-10-27 07:25:51 | aeros | create | |
|