Message 354634 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	vstinner
Recipients	christian.heimes, jpic, martin.panter, matrixise, orsenthil, ronaldoussoren, sanebow, vstinner, xtreak
Date	2019-10-14.14:07:12
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1571062033.18.0.93296219562.issue36338@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to

Content
I proposed PR 16780 which makes the urllib.parse module way more stricter: * the IPv6 address is validated by ipaddress.IPv6Address() parser * invalid characters are rejected in the IPv6 zone: "%", "[" and "]" * the port number is now validated when parsing the URL: must be an integer in the [0; 65535] range Sadly, validating using ipaddress.IPv6Address() cannot be easily ported to Python 2 which doesn't have this module.

I proposed PR 16780 which makes the urllib.parse module way more stricter:

* the IPv6 address is validated by ipaddress.IPv6Address() parser
* invalid characters are rejected in the IPv6 zone: "%", "[" and "]"
* the port number is now validated when parsing the URL: must be an integer in the [0; 65535] range

Sadly, validating using ipaddress.IPv6Address() cannot be easily ported to Python 2 which doesn't have this module.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2019-10-14 14:07:13	vstinner	set	recipients: + vstinner, ronaldoussoren, orsenthil, christian.heimes, martin.panter, matrixise, xtreak, sanebow, jpic
2019-10-14 14:07:13	vstinner	set	messageid: <1571062033.18.0.93296219562.issue36338@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-10-14 14:07:13	vstinner	link	issue36338 messages
2019-10-14 14:07:13	vstinner	create