Author pitrou
Recipients Mark.Shannon, benjamin.peterson, christian.heimes, inada.naoki, jdemeyer, larry, lukasz.langa, miss-islington, nascheme, ned.deily, pablogsal, petr.viktorin, pitrou, tim.peters, vstinner
Date 2019-10-03.22:35:15
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1570142115.13.0.0788178125664.issue38006@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
> Would it make any sense to add an opt-in option to emit a warning when a new type is created with Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_GC but it doesn't implement tp_traverse?

Or even fatal error out?  There's no reason to have Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_GC but not implement tp_traverse, AFAIR.
History
Date User Action Args
2019-10-03 22:35:15pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, tim.peters, nascheme, vstinner, larry, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, ned.deily, petr.viktorin, inada.naoki, lukasz.langa, Mark.Shannon, jdemeyer, pablogsal, miss-islington
2019-10-03 22:35:15pitrousetmessageid: <1570142115.13.0.0788178125664.issue38006@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-10-03 22:35:15pitroulinkissue38006 messages
2019-10-03 22:35:15pitroucreate