Message 353877 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	vstinner
Recipients	eric.snow, lukasz.langa, nanjekyejoannah, ncoghlan, ned.deily, tcaswell, vstinner, wenzel
Date	2019-10-03.21:02:11
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1570136532.12.0.431200883698.issue38266@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to

Content
> Since this sounds like a regression being introduced by 3.8.0, should the reversion be included in 3.8.0 final or can it wait for 3.8.1? IMHO PR 16558 is safe: it adds code which already existed in Python 2.7, and likely previously. For me it's a low risk of regression between rc1 and final. I set the priority to release blocker, but Lukasz is the last one to take the final decision on including the fix or not. Well, right now, I don't consider that PR 16558 is ready to be merged.

> Since this sounds like a regression being introduced by 3.8.0, should the reversion be included in 3.8.0 final or can it wait for 3.8.1?

IMHO PR 16558 is safe: it adds code which already existed in Python 2.7, and likely previously. For me it's a low risk of regression between rc1 and final.

I set the priority to release blocker, but Lukasz is the last one to take the final decision on including the fix or not.

Well, right now, I don't consider that PR 16558 is ready to be merged.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2019-10-03 21:02:12	vstinner	set	recipients: + vstinner, ncoghlan, ned.deily, lukasz.langa, eric.snow, tcaswell, wenzel, nanjekyejoannah
2019-10-03 21:02:12	vstinner	set	messageid: <1570136532.12.0.431200883698.issue38266@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-10-03 21:02:12	vstinner	link	issue38266 messages
2019-10-03 21:02:11	vstinner	create