Author jaraco
Recipients benjamin.peterson, cstratak, gregory.p.smith, jaraco, larry, lukasz.langa, martin.panter, miss-islington, ned.deily, orange, rschiron, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner, ware, xiang.zhang, xtreak
Date 2019-09-18.14:37:37
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1568817457.39.0.133747374998.issue30458@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
> Should we open a separate issue to track (fixing) the regression?

Yes, I think so. The ticket I referenced mainly addresses an incompatibility that was introduced with Python 3.0, so is much less urgent than the one introduced more recently, so I believe it deserves a proper, independent description and discussion. I'll gladly file that ticket, tonight most likely.
History
Date User Action Args
2019-09-18 14:37:38jaracosetrecipients: + jaraco, gregory.p.smith, vstinner, larry, benjamin.peterson, ned.deily, lukasz.langa, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka, xiang.zhang, cstratak, orange, miss-islington, xtreak, ware, rschiron
2019-09-18 14:37:37jaracosetmessageid: <1568817457.39.0.133747374998.issue30458@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-09-18 14:37:37jaracolinkissue30458 messages
2019-09-18 14:37:37jaracocreate