Author ned.deily
Recipients benjamin.peterson, cstratak, gregory.p.smith, jaraco, larry, lukasz.langa, martin.panter, miss-islington, ned.deily, orange, rschiron, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner, ware, xiang.zhang, xtreak
Date 2019-09-17.04:58:53
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1568696333.17.0.466980323829.issue30458@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
If I understand Jason's message correctly, the changes for Issue30458 introduced a regression in 3.7.4 and will introduce the same regression in other branches as they are released, including 3.5.8 whose rc1 is now in testing.  3.7.5rc1 is scheduled to be tagged later today.  Is this regression serious enough that we should hold 3.7.5 and/or 3.5.8 for a fix?  If so, there should probably be a separate issue for it unless it is necessarily intertwined with the resolution of Issue36274.

I'm provisionally setting the status of this issue to "release blocker".
History
Date User Action Args
2019-09-17 04:58:53ned.deilysetrecipients: + ned.deily, gregory.p.smith, jaraco, vstinner, larry, benjamin.peterson, lukasz.langa, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka, xiang.zhang, cstratak, orange, miss-islington, xtreak, ware, rschiron
2019-09-17 04:58:53ned.deilysetmessageid: <1568696333.17.0.466980323829.issue30458@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-09-17 04:58:53ned.deilylinkissue30458 messages
2019-09-17 04:58:53ned.deilycreate