Author xtreak
Recipients Julian, Mariatta, brett.cannon, chris.jerdonek, daniel.urban, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, martin.panter, michael.foord, pablomouzo, parkouss, pitrou, r.david.murray, rbcollins, rhettinger, ta1hia, xtreak
Date 2019-09-11.08:12:02
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1568189523.15.0.976405111623.issue11664@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
I concur with Raymond here. Since mock is also part of stdlib and this issue predates mock being merged to stdlib. I think adding it to unittest sort of expands the unittest API being just an alias to mock.patch. mock.patch is used in lot of places and has a good adoption as plain function, decorator and context manager. This would also mean explaining people why there is mock.patch and TestCase.patch in docs too.
History
Date User Action Args
2019-09-11 08:12:03xtreaksetrecipients: + xtreak, brett.cannon, rhettinger, pitrou, rbcollins, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, michael.foord, pablomouzo, daniel.urban, chris.jerdonek, Julian, martin.panter, parkouss, Mariatta, ta1hia
2019-09-11 08:12:03xtreaksetmessageid: <1568189523.15.0.976405111623.issue11664@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-09-11 08:12:03xtreaklinkissue11664 messages
2019-09-11 08:12:02xtreakcreate