Message 351677 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	xtreak
Recipients	asvetlov, docs@python, dtrauma, eamanu, mbussonn, miss-islington, xtreak, yselivanov
Date	2019-09-10.14:33:19
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1568125999.92.0.399622157225.issue36373@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to

Content
Is it okay to have _asyncio_internal keyword with default value as False and the places where it's used internally in stdlib like AsyncMock (Condition), async_case (Queue) and other tests we can pass in True? I have a patch if that would be a good approach :)

Is it okay to have _asyncio_internal keyword with default value as False and the places where it's used internally in stdlib like AsyncMock (Condition), async_case (Queue) and other tests we can pass in True? I have a patch if that would be a good approach :)

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2019-09-10 14:33:19	xtreak	set	recipients: + xtreak, asvetlov, docs@python, yselivanov, mbussonn, eamanu, miss-islington, dtrauma
2019-09-10 14:33:19	xtreak	set	messageid: <1568125999.92.0.399622157225.issue36373@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-09-10 14:33:19	xtreak	link	issue36373 messages
2019-09-10 14:33:19	xtreak	create