Author steve.dower
Recipients Leslie, serhiy.storchaka, steve.dower, terry.reedy, vstinner
Date 2019-09-09.14:23:45
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1568039026.22.0.423119618823.issue38007@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
Yes, even as a struct member name (at least in the definition), the C preprocessor will substitute a macro. It sounds like Qt defines a macro "slots", and so the definition of the struct will be broken.

Unfortunately, this would be a more significant change than removing the deprecated tp_print field, which we eventually decided not to do because of the compatibility impact. So I can confidently say we won't be able to do this one either.
History
Date User Action Args
2019-09-09 14:23:46steve.dowersetrecipients: + steve.dower, terry.reedy, vstinner, serhiy.storchaka, Leslie
2019-09-09 14:23:46steve.dowersetmessageid: <1568039026.22.0.423119618823.issue38007@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-09-09 14:23:46steve.dowerlinkissue38007 messages
2019-09-09 14:23:45steve.dowercreate