Message351348
(Just to help keep discussions together: some earlier discussion was on GH-15216 .)
Because is_small_int / IS_SMALL_INT is so small, there's not much cost in the source code to making it a macro (as GH-15710 did).
But I think it'd be a mistake to go a lot farther than that and convert significantly larger chunks of code like get_small_int to macros (as GH-15718 would), unless the payoff were really commensurate. It'd be better to focus optimization efforts where profiling shows a lot of time is really being spent. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2019-09-09 05:41:42 | Greg Price | set | recipients:
+ Greg Price, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, malin, sir-sigurd, aeros |
2019-09-09 05:41:42 | Greg Price | set | messageid: <1568007702.31.0.782792657638.issue38015@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2019-09-09 05:41:42 | Greg Price | link | issue38015 messages |
2019-09-09 05:41:42 | Greg Price | create | |
|