Message351059
For myself, I only want this for 'large' outputs. I prefer something like the following left alone.
>>> help('continue')
The "continue" statement
************************
continue_stmt ::= "continue"
"continue" may only occur syntactically nested in a "for" or "while"
loop, but not nested in a function or class definition within that
loop. It continues with the next cycle of the nearest enclosing loop.
When "continue" passes control out of a "try" statement with a
"finally" clause, that "finally" clause is executed before really
starting the next loop cycle.
Related help topics: while, for
The threshhold for squeezer should be good enough. I think of this as autosqueeze + autoexpand if this if the first output after '>>>' and the statement began with 'help('. An advantage of doing it this way is that the squeezer button remains after dismissing the viewer.
Also, I suspect that most people who disable squeezer would not like this either. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2019-09-03 05:13:44 | terry.reedy | set | recipients:
+ terry.reedy, rhettinger, taleinat |
2019-09-03 05:13:44 | terry.reedy | set | messageid: <1567487624.68.0.780670823361.issue37768@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2019-09-03 05:13:44 | terry.reedy | link | issue37768 messages |
2019-09-03 05:13:44 | terry.reedy | create | |
|