This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author vstinner
Recipients belopolsky, berker.peksag, bmispelon, corona10, p-ganssle, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, taleinat, vstinner
Date 2019-09-02.10:52:44
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1567421564.69.0.149997030505.issue24416@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
> By contrast, returning a plain tuple from `isocalendar()` is the easier *and* more performant thing to do, and given that any benefits seem marginal I'm against the switch.

Does someone have benchmark numbers? If we go with structseq, creating a new instance should be almost as efficient as creating a tuple, no?
History
Date User Action Args
2019-09-02 10:52:44vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, rhettinger, belopolsky, taleinat, berker.peksag, serhiy.storchaka, bmispelon, p-ganssle, corona10
2019-09-02 10:52:44vstinnersetmessageid: <1567421564.69.0.149997030505.issue24416@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-09-02 10:52:44vstinnerlinkissue24416 messages
2019-09-02 10:52:44vstinnercreate