Author vstinner
Recipients ArthurGoldberg, Sergey.Kirpichev, THRlWiTi, Trip.Volpe, ajaksu2, alex, amaury.forgeotdarc, barry, belopolsky, brett.cannon, diana, eric.araujo, eric.snow, ethan.furman, flox, nedbat, pgimeno, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, terry.reedy, tshepang, vstinner, yselivanov
Date 2019-08-26.21:57:45
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
>  There are different optimizations on different levels (AST, bytecode generation, peepholer), would be nice to control them separately. This means that we should pass a bitset to the compiler.

What's the use case for enabling some AST optimizations but disable bytecode generation optimizations?
Date User Action Args
2019-08-26 21:57:45vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, barry, brett.cannon, rhettinger, terry.reedy, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, ajaksu2, nedbat, eric.araujo, alex, flox, THRlWiTi, ethan.furman, tshepang, eric.snow, serhiy.storchaka, yselivanov, diana, Trip.Volpe, pgimeno, Sergey.Kirpichev, ArthurGoldberg
2019-08-26 21:57:45vstinnersetmessageid: <>
2019-08-26 21:57:45vstinnerlinkissue2506 messages
2019-08-26 21:57:45vstinnercreate