Author rhettinger
Recipients Austin Bingham, christian.heimes, mark.dickinson, rhettinger, robert_smallshire, serhiy.storchaka, tim.peters
Date 2019-08-22.06:43:48
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1566456228.96.0.662309578532.issue26680@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
Marking this as closed:
* no forward movement for a year and half 
* opposition from multiple core devs

Feel free to revive this if you truly think this is needed and want to get the debate going again.

Also, expanding the numeric tower is always going to be problematic, because any user type that currently registers with it will be instantly non-compliant.  Concrete classes can grow APIs and keep backwards compatibility but abstract classes cannot easily grow new requirements.
History
Date User Action Args
2019-08-22 06:43:49rhettingersetrecipients: + rhettinger, tim.peters, mark.dickinson, christian.heimes, serhiy.storchaka, robert_smallshire, Austin Bingham
2019-08-22 06:43:48rhettingersetmessageid: <1566456228.96.0.662309578532.issue26680@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-08-22 06:43:48rhettingerlinkissue26680 messages
2019-08-22 06:43:48rhettingercreate