Message348495
I think you're reading "equivalence" too strictly here to mean "exactly the same semantics". In this instance it means "for similar functionality, the equivalent method is ..." (admittedly this might be a quirk of the use of the word "equivalent" in North American English).
But I can see why you would interpret it the way you do. Please feel free to propose a PR to clarify the phrasing. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2019-07-26 15:47:18 | brett.cannon | set | recipients:
+ brett.cannon, pitrou, docs@python, serhiy.storchaka, godaygo |
2019-07-26 15:47:18 | brett.cannon | set | messageid: <1564156038.3.0.319897885969.issue37688@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2019-07-26 15:47:18 | brett.cannon | link | issue37688 messages |
2019-07-26 15:47:18 | brett.cannon | create | |
|