Author pablogsal
Recipients aldwinaldwin, lukasz.langa, miss-islington, ned.deily, nedbat, p-ganssle, pablogsal, serhiy.storchaka, terry.reedy, tim.peters, xtreak
Date 2019-07-05.23:22:59
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1562368980.08.0.596118975617.issue37500@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
I think I have found a simple way to make everyone happy: we can add a new field to the compiler that tells it to not emit bytecode. In this way we can detect errors by walking the blocks but no bytecode will be emitted.

I have updated PR 14612 to use this approach.
History
Date User Action Args
2019-07-05 23:23:00pablogsalsetrecipients: + pablogsal, tim.peters, terry.reedy, nedbat, ned.deily, lukasz.langa, serhiy.storchaka, p-ganssle, miss-islington, xtreak, aldwinaldwin
2019-07-05 23:23:00pablogsalsetmessageid: <1562368980.08.0.596118975617.issue37500@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-07-05 23:23:00pablogsallinkissue37500 messages
2019-07-05 23:22:59pablogsalcreate