This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author bquinlan
Recipients Steven.Barker, bquinlan, ned.deily
Date 2019-07-01.23:01:29
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CANiivop+zvvk=NQ_=us0jnw9NLNCh19+cuK2NC1c3KdOgJXs5Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1562021703.37.0.986022539496.issue31783@roundup.psfhosted.org>
Content
Can I add "needs backport to 3.8" and "needs backport to 3.7" labels now or
do I have to use cherry_picker at this point?

On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 3:55 PM Ned Deily <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:

>
> Ned Deily <nad@python.org> added the comment:
>
> > I don't know what the backport policy is.
>
> It does seem that the devguide does not give much guidance on this; I've
> opened an issue about it (https://github.com/python/devguide/issues/503).
> But, in general, if the fix is potentially beneficial and does not add
> undue risk or an incompatibility, we would generally consider backporting
> it to the currently active maintenance branches; at the moment, that would
> be 3.8 (in beta phase) and 3.7 (maintenance nmode).  We have a lot of
> buildbot tests that show non-deterministic failures, some possibly due to
> concurrent.futures.  If there is a chance that this fix might mitigate
> those, I'd like to consider it for backporting.
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <https://bugs.python.org/issue31783>
> _______________________________________
>
>
History
Date User Action Args
2019-07-01 23:01:29bquinlansetrecipients: + bquinlan, ned.deily, Steven.Barker
2019-07-01 23:01:29bquinlanlinkissue31783 messages
2019-07-01 23:01:29bquinlancreate