➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author jdemeyer
Recipients jdemeyer, ncoghlan, petr.viktorin, scoder, steve.dower, vstinner
Date 2019-06-20.05:34:32
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1561008873.14.0.0618504065373.issue37250@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content 
The fact that tp_vectorcall_offset replaces tp_print was a very conscious decision that we made already when designing the PEPs (both PEP 580 and PEP 590). We shouldn't just throw that away without a good reason.

So far I haven't seen any good reason, only an unsubstantiated claim that it is supposedly more backwards compatible to put tp_vectorcall_offset at the end.
History
Date User Action Args
2019-06-20 05:34:33jdemeyersetrecipients: + jdemeyer, ncoghlan, scoder, vstinner, petr.viktorin, steve.dower
2019-06-20 05:34:33jdemeyersetmessageid: <1561008873.14.0.0618504065373.issue37250@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-06-20 05:34:33jdemeyerlinkissue37250 messages
2019-06-20 05:34:32jdemeyercreate