➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author jdemeyer
Recipients jdemeyer, ncoghlan, petr.viktorin, scoder, steve.dower, vstinner
Date 2019-06-19.18:02:45
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1560967365.44.0.390890687406.issue37250@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content 
> If we should put in the workaround for 3.8, how does that make it okay to remove in 3.9?

I can easily change my PR to keep it in 3.9, no problem. Nick, what do you think?

> put the new field at the end and leave the deprecated one exactly as it was.

Can you give a least an argument of why that's better than putting back tp_print at the end? I gave 3 why that's NOT a good idea: msg345357
History
Date User Action Args
2019-06-19 18:02:45jdemeyersetrecipients: + jdemeyer, ncoghlan, scoder, vstinner, petr.viktorin, steve.dower
2019-06-19 18:02:45jdemeyersetmessageid: <1560967365.44.0.390890687406.issue37250@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-06-19 18:02:45jdemeyerlinkissue37250 messages
2019-06-19 18:02:45jdemeyercreate