Message345499
Right now that attribute could be set by each test separately, or even varied within a test.
TBH I'm not sure that the attribute really should be supported; perhaps thinking about breaking the API is worth doing.
But - what are we solving for here. The OP here seems interested in using the assertion like things entirely outside of a test context.
What would a nice clean API for that be? (Yes I like matchers, but put that aside - if the APIs aren't close enough, lets make sure we do a good job for each audience rather than a compromise..) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2019-06-13 11:11:20 | rbcollins | set | recipients:
+ rbcollins, ncoghlan, eric.araujo, pakal, r.david.murray, michael.foord, Julian, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka, Gregory.Salvan |
2019-06-13 11:11:20 | rbcollins | set | messageid: <1560424280.02.0.662536833273.issue19645@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2019-06-13 11:11:20 | rbcollins | link | issue19645 messages |
2019-06-13 11:11:19 | rbcollins | create | |
|