Author rbcollins
Recipients Gregory.Salvan, Julian, eric.araujo, martin.panter, michael.foord, ncoghlan, pakal, r.david.murray, rbcollins, serhiy.storchaka
Date 2019-06-13.11:11:19
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1560424280.02.0.662536833273.issue19645@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
Right now that attribute could be set by each test separately, or even varied within a test.

TBH I'm not sure that the attribute really should be supported; perhaps thinking about breaking the API is worth doing.

But - what are we solving for here. The OP here seems interested in using the assertion like things entirely outside of a test context.

What would a nice clean API for that be? (Yes I like matchers, but put that aside - if the APIs aren't close enough, lets make sure we do a good job for each audience rather than a compromise..)
History
Date User Action Args
2019-06-13 11:11:20rbcollinssetrecipients: + rbcollins, ncoghlan, eric.araujo, pakal, r.david.murray, michael.foord, Julian, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka, Gregory.Salvan
2019-06-13 11:11:20rbcollinssetmessageid: <1560424280.02.0.662536833273.issue19645@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-06-13 11:11:20rbcollinslinkissue19645 messages
2019-06-13 11:11:19rbcollinscreate