Message345087
IMO just updating the documentation would not be enough.
I suggest wrapping sys.setrecursionlimit() and *adding* 30 to the given limit, to offset the call stack depth added by IDLE. This makes more sense to me than max(n, 50), which I imagine would cause a lot of confusion in cases where it comes into effect.
If that's not acceptable, then I suggest wrapping it to raise an informative exception if the given limit is too low. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2019-06-09 19:56:45 | taleinat | set | recipients:
+ taleinat, terry.reedy, serhiy.storchaka |
2019-06-09 19:56:45 | taleinat | set | messageid: <1560110205.96.0.589345569664.issue26806@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2019-06-09 19:56:45 | taleinat | link | issue26806 messages |
2019-06-09 19:56:45 | taleinat | create | |
|