➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author giampaolo.rodola
Recipients StyXman, desbma, facundobatista, giampaolo.rodola, martin.panter, ncoghlan, neologix, pablogsal, petr.viktorin, vstinner
Date 2019-06-04.16:49:36
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1559666976.15.0.146258116518.issue26826@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content 
Actually "man copy_file_range" claims it can do server-side copy, meaning no network traffic between client and server if *src* and *dst* live on the same network fs. So I agree copy_file_range() should be preferred over sendfile() after all. =)
I have a wrapper for copy_file_range() similar to what I did in shutil in issue33671 which I can easily integrate, but I wanted to land this one first:
https://bugs.python.org/issue37096
Also, I suppose we cannot land this in time for 3.8?
History
Date User Action Args
2019-06-04 16:49:36giampaolo.rodolasetrecipients: + giampaolo.rodola, facundobatista, ncoghlan, vstinner, StyXman, petr.viktorin, neologix, martin.panter, desbma, pablogsal
2019-06-04 16:49:36giampaolo.rodolasetmessageid: <1559666976.15.0.146258116518.issue26826@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-06-04 16:49:36giampaolo.rodolalinkissue26826 messages
2019-06-04 16:49:36giampaolo.rodolacreate