Message344228
> +0 from me. It is inevitable that this will be requested now that we have comb().
Exactly my thoughts, too. I don't think I'll have any use for `math.perm`; the main reason to add it will be to satisfy all those who got taught combinations and permutations at the same time, see them as a unit, and then get surprised when they find `math.comb` without `math.perm`.
The good part is that now that we have math.comb, I think everything about the API of math.perm is already clear (including what to call it). |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2019-06-01 20:54:40 | mark.dickinson | set | recipients:
+ mark.dickinson, lemburg, rhettinger, stutzbach, serhiy.storchaka |
2019-06-01 20:54:40 | mark.dickinson | set | messageid: <1559422480.66.0.114515686992.issue37128@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2019-06-01 20:54:40 | mark.dickinson | link | issue37128 messages |
2019-06-01 20:54:40 | mark.dickinson | create | |
|