Author mark.dickinson
Recipients Jim Fasarakis-Hilliard, casevh, gbtami, mark.dickinson, niklasf, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, tim.peters
Date 2019-06-01.20:34:42
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1559421282.43.0.39503669671.issue29882@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
> Is everyone comfortable with how negative numbers are handled by this patch?

Not entirely, but it's not terribly wrong and it's consistent with how `int.bit_length` works. (I'm also a bit uncomfortable about `int.bit_length`s behaviour on negative numbers, but it is the way it is.)
History
Date User Action Args
2019-06-01 20:34:42mark.dickinsonsetrecipients: + mark.dickinson, tim.peters, rhettinger, casevh, serhiy.storchaka, Jim Fasarakis-Hilliard, niklasf, gbtami
2019-06-01 20:34:42mark.dickinsonsetmessageid: <1559421282.43.0.39503669671.issue29882@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-06-01 20:34:42mark.dickinsonlinkissue29882 messages
2019-06-01 20:34:42mark.dickinsoncreate