Author lepaperwan
Recipients Michael.Felt, asvetlov, eamanu, lepaperwan, maxifree, miss-islington, twisteroid ambassador, yselivanov
Date 2019-05-24.17:59:50
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1558720790.99.0.0906595351193.issue35545@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
I don't have an AIX lying around to test so would you mind just running the test on `getaddrinfo` for AIX. A simple `python3 -c 'import socket; print(socket.getaddrinfo("fe80::1%1", 80))'` should fairly rapidly determine if there is a legitimate reason for the test to fail (ie. this is internal to `asyncio`) or if this is tied to the underlying AIX `getaddrinfo`.

The IPv6 Scoped Address Architecture RFC clearly indicates that `<addr>%<zone>` should be supported although it isn't a must. Hopefully there's a subtlety to `getaddrinfo` on AIX (maybe in the way the zone should be specified, I already had to fallback to numeric interfaces so the test would work on both Linux & Windows, I wouldn't be surprised if AIX had yet another syntax for it).

Also, it would be worthwhile to ensure that the patches mentioned by IBM https://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1IV52116 are applied on the machine running the test.
History
Date User Action Args
2019-05-24 17:59:51lepaperwansetrecipients: + lepaperwan, asvetlov, yselivanov, Michael.Felt, eamanu, twisteroid ambassador, miss-islington, maxifree
2019-05-24 17:59:50lepaperwansetmessageid: <1558720790.99.0.0906595351193.issue35545@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-05-24 17:59:50lepaperwanlinkissue35545 messages
2019-05-24 17:59:50lepaperwancreate