Author Michael.Felt
Recipients Michael.Felt, eryksun, jaketesler, pitrou, vstinner
Date 2019-05-22.18:08:34
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <accd7d82-1e8f-91e3-e617-6495dd7d25f5@felt.demon.nl>
In-reply-to <1558541284.68.0.538883317922.issue36084@roundup.psfhosted.org>
Content
On 22/05/2019 18:08, STINNER Victor wrote:
> STINNER Victor <vstinner@redhat.com> added the comment:
>
> Michael Felt: it's annoying when you ignore Antoine's comment and my comment.
> * https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/13463#issuecomment-494797084
> * https://bugs.python.org/issue36084#msg343159
>
> The AIX case is very special and required a separated issue. Please open a separated if you want to discuss/implement get_native_id() on AIX.

My apologies. I was not ignoring anyone. I am sorry you had that impression.

I had already taken it as a given that it would not be in this PR (re:
https://bugs.python.org/issue36084#msg343159)

And, I had expressed my hope - it would not be too complex in
https://bugs.python.org/issue36084#msg343168. Which also made me realize
that an 'issue' around the "define" described in the "pthread"
documentation (so in hindsight, not applicable to an implementation of
"get_native_id()".

And, while I am sorry you feel I have ignored you - it is hardly the
case. Everyone's comments have given me a reason to look further. And it
grieves me that my intentions are misunderstood.

Thank you for your honesty!

>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <https://bugs.python.org/issue36084>
> _______________________________________
>
History
Date User Action Args
2019-05-22 18:08:34Michael.Feltsetrecipients: + Michael.Felt, pitrou, vstinner, eryksun, jaketesler
2019-05-22 18:08:34Michael.Feltlinkissue36084 messages
2019-05-22 18:08:34Michael.Feltcreate