This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author steven.daprano
Recipients dirn, eric.smith, gregory.p.smith, paul.moore, serhiy.storchaka, steven.daprano, xtreak
Date 2019-05-04.04:23:05
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
> Steven: We shouldn't block this immediately useful feature from going 
> in for f-strings on waiting for some much broader first class access 
> to expressions feature.  !d would be practical today.

I hear you, and after giving it much more thought I agree.
Date User Action Args
2019-05-04 04:23:06steven.dapranosetrecipients: + steven.daprano, gregory.p.smith, paul.moore, eric.smith, dirn, serhiy.storchaka, xtreak
2019-05-04 04:23:06steven.dapranolinkissue36774 messages
2019-05-04 04:23:05steven.dapranocreate