Message 341169 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	martin.panter
Recipients	Joe.Borg, bbayles, gregory.p.smith, martin.panter, xtreak
Date	2019-05-01.00:01:40
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1556668901.09.0.986723410403.issue36760@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to

Content
Python 3.7 added the "capture_output" parameter, for Issue 32102. Before that change, you could use "subprocess.PIPE": https://docs.python.org/3.6/library/subprocess.html#subprocess.run “To [capture output], pass PIPE for the ‘stdout’ and/or ‘stderr’ arguments” Since "capture_output" was added, it looks like you can still pass "subprocess.PIPE" on your own, but the documentation now only gives subtle hints that this might be supported. This was also brought up in Issue 33319.

Python 3.7 added the "capture_output" parameter, for Issue 32102. Before that change, you could use "subprocess.PIPE":

https://docs.python.org/3.6/library/subprocess.html#subprocess.run
“To [capture output], pass PIPE for the ‘stdout’ and/or ‘stderr’ arguments”

Since "capture_output" was added, it looks like you can still pass "subprocess.PIPE" on your own, but the documentation now only gives subtle hints that this might be supported. This was also brought up in Issue 33319.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2019-05-01 00:01:41	martin.panter	set	recipients: + martin.panter, gregory.p.smith, Joe.Borg, bbayles, xtreak
2019-05-01 00:01:41	martin.panter	set	messageid: <1556668901.09.0.986723410403.issue36760@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-05-01 00:01:41	martin.panter	link	issue36760 messages
2019-05-01 00:01:40	martin.panter	create