➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author vstinner
Recipients gregory.p.smith, martin.panter, orange, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner, ware, xiang.zhang, xtreak
Date 2019-04-10.10:45:12
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1554893112.12.0.910696926569.issue30458@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content 
> The CVE-2019-9740 has been assigned to the bpo-36276

I don't know how CVE are assigned. Since this issue started with "the patch in CVE-2016-5699 can be broke by an addition space", would it make sense to reuse CVE-2016-5699 rather than using a new CVE?
History
Date User Action Args
2019-04-10 10:45:12vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, gregory.p.smith, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka, xiang.zhang, orange, xtreak, ware
2019-04-10 10:45:12vstinnersetmessageid: <1554893112.12.0.910696926569.issue30458@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-04-10 10:45:12vstinnerlinkissue30458 messages
2019-04-10 10:45:12vstinnercreate