Message 339849 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	graingert
Recipients	graingert
Date	2019-04-10.10:43:53
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1554893033.67.0.347174535914.issue36586@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to

Content
Should the docs be: > Indicate that no more data will be put on or got from this queue by the current process. The background thread will quit once it has flushed all buffered data to the pipe. This is called automatically when the queue is garbage collected. Or should the Queue allow closing only one direction of the bidirectional channel?

Should the docs be:

> Indicate that no more data will be put on or got from this queue by the current process. The background thread will quit once it has flushed all buffered data to the pipe. This is called automatically when the queue is garbage collected.

Or should the Queue allow closing only one direction of the bidirectional channel?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2019-04-10 10:43:53	graingert	set	recipients: + graingert
2019-04-10 10:43:53	graingert	set	messageid: <1554893033.67.0.347174535914.issue36586@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-04-10 10:43:53	graingert	link	issue36586 messages
2019-04-10 10:43:53	graingert	create